Tendo Communications
340 Brannan Street, Suite 500, San Francisco, CA 94107
415.369.8200 | fax 415.369.8222 | inquiries@tendocom.com


Marketing and content trends, tools, and tips that are always one step ahead of leading edge


5 content considerations when implementing Web 2.0 strategies
Monday August 06th 2007, 1:34 pm
Filed under: Content Strategy, John Kovacevich, Web Content

1. Capability vs. strategy
Just because you CAN deploy a certain Web 2.0 technology doesn’t mean you SHOULD. Use of Web 2.0 techniques should be driven by the larger communications strategy for the customers. Web 2.0 is a MEANS to achieving your communications objectives, not a strategy in and of itself.

2. Web 2.0 content is about giving up control
Most Web 2.0 techniques “democratize” access to the Web and give more control to your users. When implementing any Web 2.0 techniques, it’s important to make sure that the company is ready and willing to cede some control to the users BEFORE it engages 2.0 tactics. (To pull back after the fact will expose the company to charges of censorship, which you want to avoid.)

3. If you build it, they may or may not come
Just because you create something doesn’t mean anybody is going to use it. (And if an element is not used, it may send a negative message to your users—that nobody is using your site.) The launch of a new Web 2.0 element must be supported by its own marketing effort, it must be supported broadly and over time, and it will require extra “care and feeding” in its first six months if you want it to take root.

4. Content creates value and builds the community
If Web 2.0 techniques are about building community, you have to create something that will draw that community. The Holy Grail is a self-sustaining community with user generated content—a true dialogue among users. But that won’t happen overnight and in the beginning, you need to supply content that “seeds” the turf and makes it attractive to other users. Blogs and Wikis in particular require a concentrated content development effort in the early stages.

5. How is YOUR company unique?
How can you use Web 2.0 in ways that no other site can? What is the unique value you can offer to a community of users? It is better to create a highly targeted pilot program that utilizes 2.0 techniques, generates a small, committed group of users, and delivers great value rather than try to mimic a large, existing Web 2.0 site. (Somebody is already doing THAT, but only you can do THIS.) ―John Kovacevich, VP, marketing services



Explain things to your users
Thursday July 12th 2007, 12:52 pm
Filed under: Content Strategy, John Kovacevich, Web Content

Lots of websites use so many acronyms and “inside” language that you need your own special glossary to decipher what’s being said. Sure, you can create a sense of community by developing a common language, but don’t just assume that your users know what you’re talking about.

One of my favorite recent examples is RSS feeds. Many websites refer to RSS feeds as if everybody understands and uses them, but LOTS of people still have no idea what RSS feeds are, how to use them, and how helpful they can be in sorting through Web content.

That’s why I love this video by commoncraft.com—a good, simple explanation of RSS that even my mother could understand. (And a great example of video explaining a concept and delivering value; it’s the perfect medium in this case.) We’ve included a link to it on our site next to our “Get the Tendo RSS Feed” button so that readers can figure out what it is before clicking. ―John Kovacevich, VP, marketing services



The lesson from Google’s latest blog controversy
Thursday July 05th 2007, 12:50 pm
Filed under: Content Strategy, In the News, John Kovacevich, Web Content

Google is in hot water this week because an employee voiced a political opinion on a corporate blog.

Obviously, it’s important for companies to have policies about the scope of their blog postings. But it would be a mistake to think that the lesson here is that all corporate blogs should have a Big Brother corporate reviewer who vets every piece of content before posting.

What makes blogging and other Web 2.0 strategies so engaging is that it democratizes communication. It means that you can communicate quickly and engage your customers directly. And it may mean that you get yourself into some sticky situations.

While Google may have wanted to avoid this controversy (although, maybe not…it is being covered widely in the press and they are getting lots of publicity), the fact is that the blog posting did exactly what it was supposed to do: It engaged the audience. People were able to respond to the post and Google clarified its position. That’s a conversation and that’s good.

It may be messier than the old way of communicating with customers, but we might as well get used to it. We’ll be seeing more and more of it. (Full disclosure: My brother works for Google, although I haven’t talked to him about this particular case.) ―John Kovacevich, VP, marketing services



Content management vs. content strategy
Friday June 15th 2007, 10:47 am
Filed under: Content Management Systems, Content Strategy, John Kovacevich, Web Content

Six years ago on this very website, I wrote an article called “Making the Move to a Content Management System.” Today, many of the ideas contained in the article are quaint. In 2007 content management systems are standard for large sites, and off-the-shelf software like Adobe’s Contribute make content management accessible for even the smallest organizations. Blogs and wikis and community forums are an extension of the CMS infrastructure, which democratized Web publishing.

But like I said back in 2001, a delivery system is not a content strategy. And just because it’s easier to post to the Web doesn’t necessarily mean that you should.

While the stats are fluid (and hotly debated based on methodology), we’re in the neighborhood of 30 billion Web pages now. That’s a big neighborhood. Before you add your content or blog or video to your corporate website, you should put it through a rigorous vetting process. Why are you adding it? What are you hoping to accomplish? Is it providing value to your readers? Will it move you closer to your business objectives? If you can’t answer those questions, don’t post…even if the CMS makes it simple to do so. ―John Kovacevich, VP, marketing services



Cinema surprises
Friday June 08th 2007, 8:37 am
Filed under: Content Strategy, Julie Jares, Multimedia, Web Content

As Chris Zender pointed out in her May 22nd blog posting, several TV shows have used innovative marketing techniques to promote their shows, including cross-media offerings like content-rich experiences online.

The marketing of films is changing, too. One tactic that has become increasingly common is the movie "Easter egg”—a scene shown after the end credits have rolled (according to Wikipedia, these post-credit scenes are also called stingers.

In the 1980s, stingers were typically funny additions at the end of comedies. Remember when Ferris tells the audience to go home at the end of Ferris Bueller’s Day Off? Movies like Airplane!, Scrooged, and other funny flicks from the decade also have stingers.

More recently, the practice has evolved as marketing has become more sophisticated. While Wikipedia’s list has a disclaimer that it’s incomplete, the site lists 11 stingers for the entire 1980s, whereas it lists 16 stingers in 2006, and eight so far in 2007. Stingers are no longer limited to comedies—dramas routinely use them as well. Pirates of the Caribbean: At World’s End has a bonus scene, if you’re patient enough to wait for the endless end credits. And franchise flicks often promote the next chapter: Matrix Reloaded had a stinger for The Matrix Revolutions. And X-Men 3: The Last Stand has a scene that reveals that a key character is still alive. Pique the interest of the audience and entice them with what’s too come. Now that’s good marketing. ―Julie Jares, managing editor



Me, too!
Thursday May 03rd 2007, 11:44 am
Filed under: Chris Zender, Content Strategy, Metrics/Web Analytics, Web Content

I’ve just met with yet another prospect who said to me, “We need to make our website more Web 2.0. We want a wiki, RSS feeds, podcasts, and a blog.” And while I’m always happy to get new business, when I asked the client about his company’s strategy behind developing these tactics, his answer was, “Our competition has them, so we need to have them as well.”

In other words, “Me, too!”

In fact, a recent scan of our inquiries box shows a decided uptick in the amount of requests we’re getting for “Web 2.0” work. Call it keeping up with the Joneses or call it competitive advantage—from my perspective, “Me, too” is driven by fear. Fear that Web 2.0 will provide business rivals with a magic formula that will grant them a permanent advantage.

And so, we have a bit of a conundrum: Everyone wants Web 2.0 tactics, but few are willing to put the time and effort into creating a strategy and roadmap for how to successfully deploy them. I think this lack of strategy stems, in part, from the immaturity of the Internet as a marketing medium. People are still unsure about how to best leverage the Internet, so when a hot new technology or technique surfaces, we grasp it without determining its real value.

Recently, I was talking about this with a friend of mine who runs the Midwest office of a national PR firm. She related a story that typifies the challenge of Web 2.0: Her team put together a Web promotion, which included a blog, for a well-known household brand. After just one week, the blog got a tremendous response—the traffic numbers tripled the agency’s projections and the team came running into my friend’s office, crowing about their success.

Which quickly diminished under my friend’s questions: What data did the team have about these visitors—age, income, geographic location? How many of the visitors had actually bought the product? Her lesson to the team: Response does not equal success.

The larger lesson for all of us is that “Me, too!” isn’t always the answer. Don’t just jump on the Web 2.0 bandwagon—use Web 2.0 technologies and tools just as you would use any others: as your goals, audience, and strategy dictate. ―Chris Zender, VP, creative services



The lessons of improvisation
Wednesday April 18th 2007, 10:22 am
Filed under: Content Strategy, Customer Care, John Kovacevich, Tendo View

This week, I returned to work at Tendo after a five-year hiatus.

For the last several years, I served as executive director of an improvisational theatre company. Like any field, “improvisational theatre” is rich and complex and I could talk about the nuances for hours … but at cocktail parties, I usually just explain it as, “It’s like that show ‘Whose Line is it Anyway?’”

Improv is creating theatre without a script. And while I wouldn’t recommend improvising your company’s marketing strategy, there are some lessons from the improv stage that can help you connect with your customers.

SAY YES – One of the cardinal rules in improv is to “say yes” to the offers made by your fellow performers. By accepting what has been suggested and building on it, you are able to create something new together. If you say “no” to an offer, you stop the scene and are unable to move forward.

Is your website “saying yes” to your visitors and potential customers? Are you building on their interest to lead them to new information? Do you engage them in a way that allows you to create something collaboratively?

LISTEN – Lots of people think improv is about being funny. But good improv is less about being clever and more about listening to what’s said and building the story with your partners. And since you are creating something from scratch with no script or roadmap, the only way forward is to listen to the contributions of others and use them as building blocks for your scene.

Do your marketing communication efforts provide an opportunity to listen to your customers? Does your website approach your partners with a pre-conceived idea or do you provide a venue where clients can engage in a two-way conversation?

BE FLEXIBLE – An improv actor may be required to play many different types of roles without preparation and must be able to construct a character on the spot. For example, if the scene calls for 80-year old grandmother from South Dakota who lost her arm in an alligator accident, you transform yourself into that character and step on stage.

Are your communication strategies nimble enough to respond to different needs? Do you have a “one size fits all” approach or do you tailor you tactics as required?

HAVE FUN – If you’ve seen the show “Whose Line is it Anyway?” you know that the players look like they are having a good time. In fact, many people don’t believe the show is unscripted because they look so loose and relaxed. Aren’t they worried about making a mistake?

No, they’re not. There is no script, so how can anything anybody says be wrong? They know that if everybody is working together, “a mistake” is just a new offer—an opportunity to go in a new direction.

Few businesses believe that mistakes are gifts, and I’m not suggesting that you instruct your marketing staff to screw up on purpose. But does your marketing communication work have a sense of fun? Are you willing to try new tactics and techniques, or is your fear of a mistake limiting your reach? Do your customers enjoy their engagement with you?

Another improv lesson: Know when to end the scene. I think I’ll end this one here. ―John Kovacevich, VP, Marketing Services



Keep it on the download—managing expectations
Thursday February 22nd 2007, 9:50 am
Filed under: Content Strategy, Customer Care, Tendo View

The media often latches on to a new, “revolutionary” technology long before it becomes available to the public. What this means is that for a long time people are excited about an idea—like downloadable movies—but then when it finally comes out the service is much more limited than the hype would have you believe. At times like these, a good communications strategy is key.

Take Netflix. Some people say that DVDs will soon go the way of the eight track and that Netflix is operating with a business model that’s yesterday’s news. Until recently, lots of people were wondering why Netflix didn’t move to a download-on-demand model. Sure, the movie studios are resistant, and not everyone has the bandwidth required—but if the iTunes store can do it, why can’t Netflix?

Well, Netflix recently answered with a video-on-demand feature initially available to only a small number of customers. The service will be rolled out, for free, to all Netflix subscribers in the coming months.

Netflix is definitely moving in the right direction—but already there are gripes that the catalog is so small, that the service only works in Internet Explorer on a Windows computer, and that downloads are only available to a small number of Netflix subscribers. Yes, it’s childish because Netflix is doing this for free (but not out of the kindness of their hearts, we’re sure), but imagine your neighbor gets this feature you’ve been yearning for—and you don’t.

The lesson here is that when your customers are really excited about something, make sure you communicate the “how” and “why” around your product launch. Netflix could have managed expectations better—the company only offered customers a vague message saying it plans to roll this out to all customers by June 2007.

Expectations from Netflix users are sky high: The company has a huge catalog of movies, it already has relationships with movie studios, and, most importantly, what took them so long? Netflix was once a shining star, and if anyone can pull out a second act, they can. In the entertainment business, it’s not what you’ve done, but what you’ve done lately.




Copyright 1999-2006 Tendo Communications. All rights reserved.